RewindRewind vs Sentry
Sentry is a deep error-and-performance platform. RewindRewind is a simpler tool that tracks product events and catches exceptions on the same bill. Both will tell you when your app breaks; they differ in depth and in how the price adds up.
Pricing
| RewindRewind | Sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Winner. 500,000 events/mo (events + errors) | 5,000 errors/mo |
| Starting price | Winner. $0, then $40 / million events | From ~$26/mo, usage billed on top |
| How errors are priced | Winner. Same $40/million as any event | Errors, spans, and replays are separate meters |
| Rough cost at ~1M errors/mo | Winner. ~$20 (after the free 500k) | Often $150–500+ |
| Surprise-bill control | Winner. Spend cap on by default | An on-demand budget you set |
marks the stronger option in each row.
Prices are list estimates and change over time. Check each tool's own pricing page before deciding.
Features
| RewindRewind | Sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Error grouping + stack traces | Yes | Winner. Yes, very deep |
| Source maps / symbolication | Yes | Yes |
| Product / event tracking | Winner. Yes, one timeline of events | Limited |
| Performance tracing (APM) | No | Winner. Yes |
| Session replay | No | Winner. Yes (separate meter) |
| Integrations | Open API + SDK | Winner. Hundreds of integrations |
marks the stronger option in each row.
When Sentry is the better choice
Teams who live in stack traces and need real depth: distributed tracing, performance monitoring, session replay, and a long list of integrations. At large error volumes Sentry's reserved-volume discounts also matter.
When RewindRewind is the better choice
Teams who want product events and exceptions in one place, on one flat bill, and don't need tracing or replay. The free tier is far larger, and the price is one number you can predict.